When life gets in the way: Supporting employees through personal crises
HR & People

When life gets in the way: Supporting employees through personal crises

Author
Erica Ancobia
CEO & Managing Director
Date Published
October 26, 2026
Read time
10 min

When life gets in the way: Supporting employees through personal crises

Life does not always go according to plan. Personal challenges, changes in family circumstances, or unexpected events can turn everyday routines upside down overnight. Things that felt manageable yesterday may suddenly require considerable energy. Work is part of that reality.

Some people need time away. Others want to keep working because familiar routines provide stability. Still others need temporary flexibility, fewer responsibilities, or simply an understanding that things may not run as usual.

For employers, managers, and HR teams, responding is not always easy. They want to help but may be unsure what is appropriate. Meanwhile, work must continue, teams need support, and business requirements remain. Trust, communication, and a willingness to find practical solutions together are essential.

Trust and openness: The foundation for support

Personal crises are part of life. Losing someone close, serious illness in the family, mental health challenges, or other major events can place considerable strain on a person. But a personal crisis does not automatically mean that someone becomes ill or unable to work.

For some, work provides an important sense of stability. Others need space or cannot work for a while. There is no single right way to respond to a personal crisis.

Why employees may choose not to share

Employers do not always know what is behind a sudden absence or a change in someone’s behavior at work. Employees may be on medical leave without disclosing their health or personal circumstances. They are entitled to that privacy.

Sometimes employees do not feel safe discussing personal difficulties. Someone who fears being viewed as less capable, unreliable, or weak may decide not to share. Yet a personal crisis says nothing definitive about professional competence or suitability. Choosing to be open should not be treated as a weakness.

Employers cannot demand trust. It develops through experience: Is personal information kept confidential? Are boundaries respected? Can people request support without fearing career consequences? An open workplace culture does not mean everyone must discuss private matters. It means they have the option.

Communication requires effort on both sides

Managers and HR teams have limited options if they do not know what is making work difficult. Employees do not need to disclose diagnoses or private details. Often, discussing practical needs is enough: Would different hours help? Do tasks need to be postponed? Would a temporary reduction in workload make a difference?

Employees who do not feel comfortable approaching their direct manager should, where possible, have other contacts, such as HR, an employee representative, or a designated trusted person. A trusted colleague may also help someone prepare for a conversation. The decision to disclose personal information remains with the employee.

When a personal crisis occurs: Balancing compassion and responsibility

When employees share that they are going through a difficult personal situation, managers may feel uncertain themselves. They want to show compassion but may not know what to say or how much support the person wants.

Nobody has to find the perfect words immediately. Genuine compassion, listening, and taking the situation seriously often matter more than well-intentioned advice. Managers can acknowledge when they are at a loss for words. In long-standing working relationships, they may also be personally affected. At the same time, they remain responsible for keeping work organized. Both realities can coexist.

Not every operational question needs to be answered in the first conversation. Often, the best initial response is to take care of urgent work and discuss possible support later.

When the employer does not know what happened

If someone suddenly goes on leave without explaining why, an employer can still offer support without asking for private details. A considerate message, information about available resources, or an invitation to contact a trusted person when ready may help. During medical leave, it should be clear that no response, explanation, or work is expected.

A lack of response does not necessarily signal a lack of trust. Sometimes someone simply does not have the energy for a conversation. Employers should respect those boundaries while organizing work independently.

Difficult conversations do not have to happen one-on-one

It can help to include another person in a sensitive conversation. Employees may bring a trusted person where agreed or where they have a legal right to do so. Under Germany’s formal workplace reintegration process, employees are expressly entitled to involve a trusted person of their choice.

On the employer side, HR can support the manager. But more participants are not always better. Everyone’s role should be clear, and the meeting should, where possible, be arranged in a way that feels comfortable to the employee.

When someone is suddenly absent: Supporting the whole team

An extended absence rarely affects only one person. Tasks need reassignment, meetings need rescheduling, and responsibilities shift. In small teams, this can quickly create significant extra work. If two people manage a function together and one is suddenly absent, the other cannot sustainably do both jobs.

Employers should assess early which tasks are essential, what can wait, and whether additional capacity is needed. Interim support or external service providers can help bridge the gap. It is better to consider these options before the remaining team reaches its limits.

Colleagues need to know who is covering which responsibilities and whom to contact. They do not need to know the personal reasons for an absence. If the employee wants information shared, the details should ideally be agreed together. Otherwise, communication should stay limited to what is operationally necessary. This is about personal boundaries and respect, not just data protection.

Preparing ahead makes difficult situations easier

Backup arrangements, documented processes, and shared workspaces should ideally be in place before an unexpected absence. Employers should also establish clear rules on personal use of company email accounts and lawful procedures for accessing business information when necessary. Prohibiting personal use does not, by itself, permit unrestricted access to an employee’s mailbox.

Shared inboxes and clear ownership can prevent essential information from being held by one person alone. These measures protect business continuity and reduce pressure on employees who are away.

What flexibility can employers offer?

Not every personal crisis requires an extended leave. Sometimes a few days off help; sometimes flexible arrangements are needed for several weeks. The right approach depends on the person’s circumstances and the employer’s operational needs.

Clear policies provide certainty, but individual solutions still matter

Employers should define in advance what support may be available for significant personal events, such as special leave, short-term time off, flexible schedules, or use of accrued time. Policies should be understandable, accessible, and applied fairly. Support should not depend on how close someone is to their manager.

At the same time, personal crises cannot be reduced to rigid categories. Clear baseline policies should leave room for individual arrangements. Fairness means using transparent criteria and treating comparable situations consistently, not necessarily giving everyone identical solutions.

Special leave and paid time off

In certain circumstances, employees may be entitled to paid time off for a temporary personal impediment under Section 616 of the German Civil Code (BGB). Employment agreements and collective bargaining agreements may restrict or exclude this provision. Employers can choose to offer more generous arrangements, such as paid special leave for specified family events. A legal option to exclude a benefit does not mean an employer must do so. Employees should know their options before a crisis occurs.

‍Flexibility instead of complete absence

Some employees want to maintain their normal work routine. Someone supporting a family member or accompanying them to appointments may be able to continue working with more flexible start and finish times. Remote work, fewer meetings, temporary reductions in hours, or adjusted priorities may also help. Arrangements should be agreed together and documented where appropriate.

German law also provides options for urgent caregiving situations. Subject to statutory conditions, employees may be absent for up to ten working days to arrange or ensure care for a close relative. Care support allowance (Pflegeunterstützungsgeld) may be available in qualifying cases, along with other longer-term leave options.

Vacation, accrued time, and unpaid leave

Regular vacation or an agreed use of accrued overtime can create time for personal matters, provided the applicable rules allow it. However, genuine illness-related incapacity for work should not be disguised as vacation or overtime reduction.

Longer unpaid leave can have financial consequences. Under German social security rules, employment without pay generally continues to be treated as insured employment for no longer than one month. After that, health and long-term care insurance arrangements need to be reviewed; personal contributions or alternative coverage may apply. HR and payroll should clarify the implications early.

When an employee is medically unable to work

A personal crisis is not automatically an illness. But if a health condition prevents someone from performing their job, a doctor may certify incapacity for work. Subject to statutory conditions, employers in Germany generally continue pay for up to six weeks; eligible employees with statutory health insurance may then receive sickness benefits.

Staying in touch during an extended absence: Offer contact, respect distance

Some people want to stay connected to colleagues during a personal crisis. Others need peace and distance. Managers can offer contact without making it an expectation. One employee may appreciate an occasional message; another may want only essential operational information.

Where possible, it helps to discuss what feels right. This does not require a rigid communication schedule, and preferences may change. During medical leave, personal contact must not turn into an indirect obligation to report health details or carry out work.

Returning to work: Why the transition deserves attention

After an extended absence, tasks, responsibilities, and processes may have changed. Returning does not necessarily mean someone can immediately handle the same workload as before. The return should therefore be considered more than the end date of an absence.

Agreeing on what is manageable now

An initial conversation can help align expectations and priorities. What has changed? Which tasks are waiting? Would temporary adjustments help? Managers should neither assume reduced capability nor expect everything to return to normal immediately.

Less complex tasks, fewer meetings, or a gradual handover of responsibilities may help some people. Others want to return quickly to their usual work. Decisions should be made together and revisited if needed.

Formal options: BEM and the Hamburg model

Germany offers formal mechanisms following longer illness-related absences. Under Section 167(2) of Book IX of the German Social Code (SGB IX), employers must offer workplace integration management (betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement, or BEM) when an employee has been unable to work for more than six weeks, continuously or repeatedly, within a one-year period. Participation is voluntary, and suitable measures are explored together.

Under phased return to work (stufenweise Wiedereingliederung, often called the Hamburg model), work demands are gradually increased according to a medical plan. The employee generally remains officially unable to work during the process. The two mechanisms differ but can be combined. Not every return requires or qualifies for them.  

Individual arrangements without a formal process

Individual arrangements can also help after personal leave or after an employee has been declared fit for regular work: different priorities, flexible hours, or a gradual transfer of responsibilities. Changes to contractual working hours may require a separate agreement. Not every task needs to return to its previous owner after a lengthy absence.

Support for employees, managers, and executive leadership

Managers are not therapists. They can listen, show understanding, and adjust working conditions, but they do not have to resolve every personal crisis. Long-standing relationships can make a situation personally difficult for managers, and HR teams may also need support.

External counseling, employee assistance programs (EAPs), and platforms such as nilo may offer individual mental health sessions and management coaching. Support may focus on a manager’s own well-being or on responding appropriately to employees. Availability depends on the service and the employer’s arrangements. In Germany, TelefonSeelsorge offers free, anonymous, 24/7 emotional support at 116 123. Such services do not replace medical or psychotherapeutic treatment when it is needed.

Personal crises affect leaders, too

Managers and executives can experience personal crises just like anyone else. People in senior roles may find it especially difficult to delegate. Employers should therefore plan backup responsibilities, decision-making authority, and access rights for leadership roles as well. Managing directors may be subject to different contractual and legal rules because of their corporate position. Regardless of role, they may need support and temporary relief.

Conclusion: Compassion and business responsibility belong together

Personal crises cannot be prevented and rarely follow a predictable timeline. Employers cannot solve them, but they can influence whether work adds unnecessary strain.

That requires trust, clear communication, and reliable policies. At the same time, organizations need to maintain operations and protect remaining team members from sustained overload.

Not every crisis results in illness or extended leave. Sometimes more flexibility is enough to help someone continue working. In other cases, time, professional support, or a gradual return is needed. Responding well does not mean having a perfect answer for every situation. It means creating conditions in which people can find support while the organization remains able to function.

‍

📌 Questions about supporting employees through personal crises? Contact us directly or book an appointment

📌 Follow KUNO on LinkedIn

📌 Subscribe to our newsletter to receive more practical HR and payroll insights.

‍

‍

‍

Did you find this article interesting?
Feel free to share it with others!

Discover More

International Payroll: Why coordination is often more complex than the actual payroll processing itself
Payroll
HR & People
KUNO Insights

International Payroll: Why coordination is often more complex than the actual payroll processing itself

Mandy Stegemann
Director Payroll Services
Published on
10.26.2026
X Mins Read

Global payroll platforms as a foundation for centralized processes

Many international companies use centralized HR systems or global payroll platforms to simplify their operations.

These solutions can offer significant organizational advantages. Data can be managed centrally, payroll status viewed across countries, and results consolidated for Finance. Depending on the provider, integrations with HR and Finance systems may also be available.

Technical capabilities and service models vary. Some providers organize international payroll services, including local payroll processing, while others focus more on integrating existing payroll providers and standardizing data flows and processes.

Payslip is one example of the latter model. Its platform connects existing local payroll providers with HR and Finance systems and supports centralized oversight without performing the underlying salary calculations itself.

Regardless of the model, national regulations and local payroll requirements must still be observed. Accurate employee data, payroll review, and employee communication also remain essential parts of the process.

When selecting an international payroll solution, companies should therefore consider not only technical features but also how operational collaboration is organized, which tasks the provider handles, and which responsibilities remain internal.

An appropriate platform and well-organized payroll coordination complement each other. Together, they provide the foundation for reliable and efficient international payroll processes.

How to identify and prevent organizational blind spots
HR & People
Payroll

How to identify and prevent organizational blind spots

Sonja Wehner
Director HR Services
Published on
10.26.2026
X Mins Read

When is a good time for a process review?

Quieter periods in a company offer a good opportunity to take a closer look at existing processes. This may be the case during the summer or winter months, for example, when there are fewer requests or meetings. At the same time, vacation coverage can reveal weaknesses, particularly when knowledge, access rights, or responsibilities depend heavily on individuals. Organizational changes or recurring challenges in day-to-day operations can also make a process review worthwhile.

However, a process review does not have to become a major transformation project. A clearly defined process, a small team, and two to three hours of focused work are enough to get started.

Useful guiding questions include: 

  • Which process generates the most questions or waiting time in daily work? 
  • Which information is entered, forwarded, or reviewed more than once? 
  • Where do we rely on the experience and knowledge of individual employees? 
  • Which approval demonstrably reduces which risk? 
  • Which documentation is outdated or not used in practice? 
  • Which small improvement could we test within one day? 

A realistic scope is essential. Attempting to redesign onboarding, payroll, recruiting, absence management, and reporting at the same time is more likely to create another major project. A recurring, clearly measurable workflow is a better starting point, such as the monthly payroll handover, the creation of employment documents, or the offboarding process.

Benefits are not a fruit basket – why standard solutions no longer work
HR & People
KUNO Insights

Benefits are not a fruit basket – why standard solutions no longer work

Erica Ancobia
CEO & Managing Director
Published on
10.26.2026
X Mins Read

How companies can find the right approach

The biggest challenge is not choosing a specific benefit. It is understanding what is actually needed.

Successful companies take a step back. They look beyond what is offered and focus on how their workforce actually lives and works.

Which life stages are represented? Which challenges appear repeatedly? Which benefits are used – and which are not?

Only then does a meaningful setup emerge.

It is also important not to view benefits in isolation. Topics such as tax treatment, system integration, and communication are just as important as the benefit itself.

This is often where support becomes relevant – not in choosing a specific benefit, but in evaluating, implementing, and integrating it into existing structures.

LEARN MORE ABOUT KUNOKUNO