Occupational Pension Schemes – Legal Requirement, Benefit, and Process Challenge
HR & People
Payroll

Occupational Pension Schemes – Legal Requirement, Benefit, and Process Challenge

Author
Mandy Stegemann
Director Payroll Services
Date Published
August 12, 2026
Read time
9 min

Occupational Pension Schemes – Legal Requirement, Benefit, and Process Challenge

Occupational pension schemes (in German: betriebliche Altersversorgung or bAV) are often categorized somewhere between a “benefit,” a “legal obligation,” and an “administrative special topic” within many organizations.

Many executive teams and HR departments are still hesitant when it comes to introducing such schemes. Not because they fail to see the value – but because the topic is often associated with complexity, paperwork, and insurance jargon.

This perception largely stems from the traditional broker model:

  • several insurance providers to choose from
  • individual consultation meetings for employees
  • physical application forms
  • manual forwarding of documents to HR
  • Excel spreadsheets for tracking
  • extensive coordination with payroll

The result: implementation felt heavy, time-consuming, and administratively risky.

Especially in growing startups or lean SMEs, this often leads to the impression:

"The effort simply isn’t worth it."

As a result, a legal entitlement is often implemented only reactively – meaning only when employees explicitly ask for it.

The real issue, therefore, is not the occupational pension scheme itself, but the outdated implementation model.

One fact remains clear: it is not a voluntary perk. Employees in Germany have a legal right to salary conversion into a pension scheme. At the same time, when implemented well, it can become a genuine strategic advantage in employer branding.

The challenge is rarely whether to offer it, but how to implement it.

What Is an Occupational Pension Scheme?

An occupational pension scheme is an additional retirement savings arrangement provided through the employer. A portion of an employee’s gross salary is redirected into a pension product, usually benefiting from tax and social security advantages.

The legal framework is defined in the German Occupational Pensions Act (Betriebsrentengesetz – BetrAVG). Since 2019, the following rule applies:

Employers must contribute at least 15% of the converted salary amount if they save social security contributions through the salary conversion.

This entitlement exists regardless of whether the company actively promotes the pension scheme as a benefit.

Important: occupational pension schemes are not optional marketing benefits. They are an employee right.

The Five Implementation Models - Theory vs. Practice

From a legal perspective, five implementation routes exist:

  • Direct insurance (Direktversicherung)
  • Pension fund (Pensionskasse)
  • Pension investment fund (Pensionsfonds)
  • Support fund (Unterstützungskasse)
  • Direct employer promise (Direktzusage)

In practice, direct insurance and pension funds are the most common solutions for startups, scale-ups, and SMEs. The other options tend to be structurally and financially more complex.

What is often underestimated is that the chosen implementation route affects not only the insurance product itself but also payroll processes, liability considerations, documentation requirements, and future employer changes.

Occupational Pensions as a Benefit - But Let’s Be Honest

Many job advertisements say:

"We offer an occupational pension scheme."

This sounds like an additional perk. In reality, it is a legal entitlement.

The real difference arises when companies:

  • increase the employer contribution beyond 15%
  • provide structured guidance and advice
  • offer a simple digital access process
  • communicate the benefit in a clear and understandable way

Only then does a legal obligation turn into a genuine benefit.

Younger employees in particular often underestimate the potential of occupational pensions. Transparent communication and simple processes can make a significant difference.

Payroll - Where It Becomes Technically Relevant

Within occupational pension schemes, several factors can increase the complexity of payroll processing and create additional administrative workload. A clear and well-defined interface between HR, payroll, and the provider is therefore essential.

Such situations arise, for example, in relation to:

  • tax treatment
  • social security contributions
  • employer contribution calculations
  • contribution ceilings
  • reporting procedures
  • bonus payments
  • parental leave, maternity protection, or sick pay
  • employee exits and employer changes

Errors in these areas often result in incorrect payroll calculations, back payments, employee inquiries, and unnecessary administrative effort. Complexity increases quickly, particularly when multiple providers or legacy contracts are involved. Clear processes and responsibilities are therefore essential.

The Past: Broker-Based Models with High Internal Effort

For many years, occupational pension schemes typically followed a traditional model:

  • a broker presented different insurance products
  • employees participated in individual consultation meetings
  • HR collected application forms
  • payroll implemented everything manually
  • changes were communicated via email or paper forms

Responsibility for communication, documentation, and tracking largely remained within the organization.

This approach was time-consuming and prone to errors.

Today: Digital Occupational Pension Platforms

Today, specialized partners offer occupational pension schemes as integrated services, for example Insurancy.

These providers combine:

  • digital consultation
  • transparent comparison models
  • employee communication tools
  • administration platforms
  • support for onboarding and offboarding
  • payroll integrations

This means HR teams no longer need to coordinate every contract change individually.

For HR teams and employees, this creates several practical advantages:

Reduced HR workload
Communication, advice, and contract management are handled in a structured way through a platform.

Transparency for employees
Digital dashboards provide clear insight into contributions and future projections.

Standardized processes
Fewer individual special solutions and more systematic structures.

Compliance security
Documentation and employer contributions are recorded correctly.

Scalability
Particularly important for growing organizations.

Despite these advantages, one important point remains: responsibility for occupational pensions ultimately remains with the employer.

Even when using a platform:

  • the employer remains the contractual partner
  • correct payroll implementation remains an internal responsibility or lies with the payroll provider
  • liability issues cannot be fully outsourced

This is why clear internal responsibilities and close collaboration between HR, finance, and payroll remain essential.

Typical Practical Questions from Companies

In the practical implementation of occupational pension schemes, similar questions arise in many organizations. These questions relate both to organizational decisions and day-to-day operational implementation.

What happens when salaries increase?
Whether contributions automatically adjust or remain fixed must be defined in advance.

How should existing contracts be handled?
Not every legacy insurance contract can easily be integrated into a new system.

What about international employees?
Occupational pensions are based on German social security law. Remote employment or international assignments can therefore create additional complexity.

How should the benefit be communicated transparently?
Providing contract documents alone is usually not sufficient.

These questions illustrate that occupational pension schemes are not merely insurance products. They require clear processes, understandable communication, and structured organizational integration.

Strategic Perspective for Leadership

Occupational pensions affect three levels simultaneously:

  • legal obligations
  • financial implications
  • employer branding

They are therefore not an isolated HR topic.

Organizations that implement them in a structured way often experience:

  • fewer employee questions
  • clearer payroll processes
  • higher acceptance among employees
  • a more professional external perception

Organizations that treat the topic as a side issue often struggle with special cases and manual corrections.

Recommendations for HR and Management

For organizations that want to structure or further develop their occupational pension schemes, a clear organizational framework can help. Several basic steps have proven effective in practice:

  • review the current situation – are there existing legacy contracts?
  • clearly define the employer contribution
  • carefully document the payroll process
  • evaluate digital partners
  • actively communicate the benefit

These points highlight an important aspect: occupational pension schemes are not insurance products that are implemented once and then left unchanged. They are ongoing processes that should be reviewed regularly and adapted as organizational structures evolve.

Why the Topic Needs a More Modern Perspective

For many employees, retirement planning feels distant. At the same time, awareness of financial security is increasing.

A modern occupational pension solution should therefore be:

  • digital
  • easy to understand
  • transparent
  • administratively lean
  • seamlessly integrated into payroll

This is exactly where HR strategy meets operational excellence.

Conclusion

Occupational pension schemes have long suffered from their own image: too complex, too paper-based, too closely associated with traditional insurance models.

In reality, they are neither optional nor marginal. They are a legal entitlement and a structural component of modern compensation systems.

Organizations that approach the topic strategically and implement clear processes reduce operational friction while strengthening their employer brand.

The pension scheme itself is not inherently complex.

It only becomes complex when implemented without structure.

When implemented properly, it becomes a predictable, administratively manageable, and valuable component of professional HR and payroll operations.

‍

📌 Questions about occupational pension schemes? Contact us directly or book an appointment

📌 Follow KUNO on LinkedIn

📌 Subscribe to our newsletter to receive more practical HR and payroll insights.

‍

‍

Did you find this article interesting?
Feel free to share it with others!

Discover More

International Payroll: Why coordination is often more complex than the actual payroll processing itself
Payroll
HR & People
KUNO Insights

International Payroll: Why coordination is often more complex than the actual payroll processing itself

Mandy Stegemann
Director Payroll Services
Published on
10.26.2026
X Mins Read

Global payroll platforms as a foundation for centralized processes

Many international companies use centralized HR systems or global payroll platforms to simplify their operations.

These solutions can offer significant organizational advantages. Data can be managed centrally, payroll status viewed across countries, and results consolidated for Finance. Depending on the provider, integrations with HR and Finance systems may also be available.

Technical capabilities and service models vary. Some providers organize international payroll services, including local payroll processing, while others focus more on integrating existing payroll providers and standardizing data flows and processes.

Payslip is one example of the latter model. Its platform connects existing local payroll providers with HR and Finance systems and supports centralized oversight without performing the underlying salary calculations itself.

Regardless of the model, national regulations and local payroll requirements must still be observed. Accurate employee data, payroll review, and employee communication also remain essential parts of the process.

When selecting an international payroll solution, companies should therefore consider not only technical features but also how operational collaboration is organized, which tasks the provider handles, and which responsibilities remain internal.

An appropriate platform and well-organized payroll coordination complement each other. Together, they provide the foundation for reliable and efficient international payroll processes.

How to identify and prevent organizational blind spots
HR & People
Payroll

How to identify and prevent organizational blind spots

Sonja Wehner
Director HR Services
Published on
10.26.2026
X Mins Read

When is a good time for a process review?

Quieter periods in a company offer a good opportunity to take a closer look at existing processes. This may be the case during the summer or winter months, for example, when there are fewer requests or meetings. At the same time, vacation coverage can reveal weaknesses, particularly when knowledge, access rights, or responsibilities depend heavily on individuals. Organizational changes or recurring challenges in day-to-day operations can also make a process review worthwhile.

However, a process review does not have to become a major transformation project. A clearly defined process, a small team, and two to three hours of focused work are enough to get started.

Useful guiding questions include: 

  • Which process generates the most questions or waiting time in daily work? 
  • Which information is entered, forwarded, or reviewed more than once? 
  • Where do we rely on the experience and knowledge of individual employees? 
  • Which approval demonstrably reduces which risk? 
  • Which documentation is outdated or not used in practice? 
  • Which small improvement could we test within one day? 

A realistic scope is essential. Attempting to redesign onboarding, payroll, recruiting, absence management, and reporting at the same time is more likely to create another major project. A recurring, clearly measurable workflow is a better starting point, such as the monthly payroll handover, the creation of employment documents, or the offboarding process.

Benefits are not a fruit basket – why standard solutions no longer work
HR & People
KUNO Insights

Benefits are not a fruit basket – why standard solutions no longer work

Erica Ancobia
CEO & Managing Director
Published on
10.26.2026
X Mins Read

How companies can find the right approach

The biggest challenge is not choosing a specific benefit. It is understanding what is actually needed.

Successful companies take a step back. They look beyond what is offered and focus on how their workforce actually lives and works.

Which life stages are represented? Which challenges appear repeatedly? Which benefits are used – and which are not?

Only then does a meaningful setup emerge.

It is also important not to view benefits in isolation. Topics such as tax treatment, system integration, and communication are just as important as the benefit itself.

This is often where support becomes relevant – not in choosing a specific benefit, but in evaluating, implementing, and integrating it into existing structures.

LEARN MORE ABOUT KUNOKUNO