Preparing for the German Pay Transparency Act: Why pay transparency becomes a strategic HR priority
Blog
Preparing for the German Pay Transparency Act: Why pay transparency becomes a strategic HR priority
HR & People
Payroll

Preparing for the German Pay Transparency Act: Why pay transparency becomes a strategic HR priority

Author
Sonja Wehner
Director HR Services
Date Published
April 10, 2026
Read time
8 min
Table of Contents
Preparing for the German Pay Transparency Act: Why pay transparency becomes a strategic HR priority
From a marginal topic to a structural field of action
Pay transparency will start in recruiting
Information rights and comparability move into focus
Reversal of the burden of proof: objective criteria become mandatory
New reporting obligations and continuous governance
Typical challenges in practice
Pay transparency as an opportunity for trust and professionalism
The cultural dimension: transparency requires preparation
Conclusion: shaping now instead of reacting later

Preparing for the German Pay Transparency Act: Why pay transparency becomes a strategic HR priority

Pay transparency is not a new topic for HR. However, from 2026 onward, it will take on a new dimension. With the implementation of the EU Pay Transparency Directive into German law (Entgelttransparenzgesetz), what was previously a rather limited individual right to information will evolve into a comprehensive transparency and governance topic. The implications go far beyond individual requests and affect compensation structures, recruiting processes, HR IT, payroll, and internal communication.

For HR professionals, this means one thing above all: less case-by-case handling, more system-based work – and significantly greater strategic responsibility.

From a marginal topic to a structural field of action

Until now, the German Pay Transparency Act has had limited practical relevance for many organizations. Individual information rights applied only to companies with more than 200 employees, and reporting obligations only from 500 employees upward. In practice, this often resulted in few requests, improvised processes, and low prioritization in day-to-day HR work.

With the implementation of the EU directive, this will fundamentally change. Pay transparency will start earlier, be more clearly regulated, and affect a much larger number of organizations. What was once treated as an exception will become a standard part of HR operations.

Pay transparency will start in recruiting

One of the most significant changes concerns timing. From 2026, pay transparency will apply even before hiring. Employers will be required to inform candidates about the starting salary or at least a realistic salary range prior to the first interview. At the same time, asking about previous salaries will no longer be permitted.

For HR, this means that compensation frameworks must not only exist, but also be explainable, consistent, and aligned with the market. Organizations that still rely heavily on individual negotiations without a clear structure will need to justify their approach – externally in recruiting and internally within the organization.

Information rights and comparability move into focus

The framework will also change noticeably for existing employees. Information rights will be expanded and standardized. Employees will be entitled to request information about the average compensation for comparable roles, differentiated by gender.

Crucially, comparability is not based on job titles, but on work of equal value. This brings job evaluation, job architectures, and role definitions into sharp focus. Without a solid and consistent system, each request for information can quickly become both a legal and operational challenge.

Reversal of the burden of proof: objective criteria become mandatory

One of the most relevant changes for HR leadership is the planned reversal of the burden of proof. In the future, it will no longer be sufficient to refer to historical developments or individual negotiations. If pay differences are identified, the employer must actively demonstrate that these differences are based on objective, gender-neutral criteria such as experience, qualifications, responsibility, or performance.

These criteria must not only be defined, but also documented and applied consistently. This is where the close link between pay transparency, performance management, career paths, and leadership culture becomes particularly evident.

New reporting obligations and continuous governance

Expanded reporting requirements will also apply. Companies with 250 or more employees will be required to report annually starting in 2026. Companies with 150 or more employees will follow from 2027 on a three-year cycle. These obligations include regular analyses of the gender pay gap.

If these analyses reveal unjustified pay differences, organizations may be required to work together with employee representatives to develop concrete corrective measures. Pay transparency thus becomes a continuous governance process – not a one-off analysis.

Typical challenges in practice

In practice, three recurring challenges often emerge:

  • Missing or inconsistent compensation frameworks
  • Insufficient data quality in HR and payroll systems
  • Uncertainty in internal communication

The communication aspect in particular is often underestimated. Greater transparency does not automatically lead to greater acceptance. Employees will ask questions, draw comparisons, and expect clear and understandable explanations. In this context, HR takes on the role of translator between numbers, systems, and lived perceptions of fairness.

Pay transparency as an opportunity for trust and professionalism

From our perspective, pay transparency is not merely a compliance topic. When implemented thoughtfully, it becomes a lever for trust, employer attractiveness, and professional HR work. It forces organizations to stop treating compensation as a sensitive taboo and instead address it as a deliberate and manageable element of their people strategy.

Rather than starting with the question of what the law requires in detail, it is worth taking an honest look at the current state. How are roles defined today? How are salaries actually determined – beyond formal guidelines? What data is available, and where are the gaps?

Based on this, robust job and compensation architectures can be developed, clear pay criteria defined, and legal requirements translated into practical HR and payroll processes. Integration into existing systems is key so that pay transparency works in everyday operations – and does not turn into a permanent Excel-based workaround.

The cultural dimension: transparency requires preparation

Equally important is preparing the organization for the cultural dimension of transparency. Leaders must be able to explain pay decisions in a clear and credible way. HR teams need confidence in handling information requests. Employees should understand what pay transparency means – and what it does not mean.

Pay transparency does not create uniformity. It requires clarity, consistency, and a shared understanding of fairness.

Conclusion: shaping now instead of reacting later

For HR professionals, the key question is no longer whether action is required, but how structured the approach should be. The fundamental requirements are foreseeable, and the lead time is shorter than it may appear – especially in organizations with historically grown compensation structures.

Those who start now not only create legal certainty, but also gain strategic room to shape the future.

If you would like to understand how well your organization is already prepared for pay transparency, we are happy to support with a structured pay transparency check – practical, data-driven, and with a clear roadmap. Pay transparency is here to stay. The only question is whether HR will manage it – or actively shape it.

‍

📌 Questions about the pay transparency act? Contact us directly or book an appointment

‍📌 Follow KUNO on LinkedIn‍

📌 Sign up for our newsletter to not miss any further helpful insights

Did you find this article interesting?
Feel free to share it with others!

Discover More

International Payroll: Why coordination is often more complex than the actual payroll processing itself
Payroll
HR & People
KUNO Insights

International Payroll: Why coordination is often more complex than the actual payroll processing itself

Mandy Stegemann
Director Payroll Services
Published on
10.26.2026
X Mins Read

Global payroll platforms as a foundation for centralized processes

Many international companies use centralized HR systems or global payroll platforms to simplify their operations.

These solutions can offer significant organizational advantages. Data can be managed centrally, payroll status viewed across countries, and results consolidated for Finance. Depending on the provider, integrations with HR and Finance systems may also be available.

Technical capabilities and service models vary. Some providers organize international payroll services, including local payroll processing, while others focus more on integrating existing payroll providers and standardizing data flows and processes.

Payslip is one example of the latter model. Its platform connects existing local payroll providers with HR and Finance systems and supports centralized oversight without performing the underlying salary calculations itself.

Regardless of the model, national regulations and local payroll requirements must still be observed. Accurate employee data, payroll review, and employee communication also remain essential parts of the process.

When selecting an international payroll solution, companies should therefore consider not only technical features but also how operational collaboration is organized, which tasks the provider handles, and which responsibilities remain internal.

An appropriate platform and well-organized payroll coordination complement each other. Together, they provide the foundation for reliable and efficient international payroll processes.

How to identify and prevent organizational blind spots
HR & People
Payroll

How to identify and prevent organizational blind spots

Sonja Wehner
Director HR Services
Published on
10.26.2026
X Mins Read

When is a good time for a process review?

Quieter periods in a company offer a good opportunity to take a closer look at existing processes. This may be the case during the summer or winter months, for example, when there are fewer requests or meetings. At the same time, vacation coverage can reveal weaknesses, particularly when knowledge, access rights, or responsibilities depend heavily on individuals. Organizational changes or recurring challenges in day-to-day operations can also make a process review worthwhile.

However, a process review does not have to become a major transformation project. A clearly defined process, a small team, and two to three hours of focused work are enough to get started.

Useful guiding questions include: 

  • Which process generates the most questions or waiting time in daily work? 
  • Which information is entered, forwarded, or reviewed more than once? 
  • Where do we rely on the experience and knowledge of individual employees? 
  • Which approval demonstrably reduces which risk? 
  • Which documentation is outdated or not used in practice? 
  • Which small improvement could we test within one day? 

A realistic scope is essential. Attempting to redesign onboarding, payroll, recruiting, absence management, and reporting at the same time is more likely to create another major project. A recurring, clearly measurable workflow is a better starting point, such as the monthly payroll handover, the creation of employment documents, or the offboarding process.

Benefits are not a fruit basket – why standard solutions no longer work
HR & People
KUNO Insights

Benefits are not a fruit basket – why standard solutions no longer work

Erica Ancobia
CEO & Managing Director
Published on
10.26.2026
X Mins Read

How companies can find the right approach

The biggest challenge is not choosing a specific benefit. It is understanding what is actually needed.

Successful companies take a step back. They look beyond what is offered and focus on how their workforce actually lives and works.

Which life stages are represented? Which challenges appear repeatedly? Which benefits are used – and which are not?

Only then does a meaningful setup emerge.

It is also important not to view benefits in isolation. Topics such as tax treatment, system integration, and communication are just as important as the benefit itself.

This is often where support becomes relevant – not in choosing a specific benefit, but in evaluating, implementing, and integrating it into existing structures.

LEARN MORE ABOUT KUNOKUNO